mitai-jinkendo/.claude/docs/audit/platzhalter/reconciliation-2026-03-30/EXECUTIVE_RECONCILIATION_SUMMARY.md

Executive Reconciliation Summary

Generated: 2026-03-30 14:58:37 Scope: 111 Placeholders Data Sources: Export Catalog, Audit Reports (2026-03-29), Draft Document

Overview

This reconciliation consolidates data from three authoritative sources to create a single source of truth for all 111 placeholders.

Key Findings

• 71 placeholders (63%) are implemented in code
• 8 placeholders (7%) are fully compliant with normative requirements
• 22 placeholders (20%) are partially compliant
• 81 placeholders (73%) are non-compliant

Reconciliation Results

• Verified Match (7): Draft, Export, and Audit align perfectly
• Needs Sharpening (49): Correct but incomplete metadata
• Needs Refactor (16): Code-docs conflicts exist
• Draft Wrong (0): Draft specification incorrect
• New Required (39): Not implemented, needs build
• Unclear (0): Manual review needed

Priority Distribution

• P0 (Critical): 83 placeholders
  • High usage (breaking change risk)
  • Missing documentation (category/description)
  • Unknown time window
• P1 (High): 10 placeholders
  • Partially compliant with minor gaps
• P2 (Medium): 10 placeholders
  • Non-compliant, needs work
• P3 (Low): 8 placeholders
  • Compliant, maintenance only

Critical Issues

1. Known Code-Documentation Conflicts

• weight_trend: Code uses 28d, docs say 7d/30d
  • Resolution: Update docs to match code (28d)
• activity_summary: Code uses 14d, docs say 7d
  • Resolution: Update docs to match code (14d)
• activity_detail: Time window unclear in code
  • Resolution: Needs code review to determine actual time window

2. High-Usage Placeholders (Breaking Change Risk)

• name (19 uses, non_compliant)
• geschlecht (14 uses, non_compliant)
• height (12 uses, non_compliant)
• weight_aktuell (10 uses, compliant)
• weight_trend (10 uses, compliant)
• goal_bf_pct (10 uses, non_compliant)
• caliper_summary (8 uses, partially_compliant)
• circ_summary (8 uses, compliant)
• goal_weight (8 uses, non_compliant)
• protein_ziel_low (7 uses, non_compliant)
• protein_ziel_high (7 uses, non_compliant)
• activity_detail (4 uses, non_compliant)

3. Missing Documentation (P0)

49 placeholders lack category classification 49 placeholders lack descriptions

Recommendations

Immediate Actions (P0)

1. Resolve Known Conflicts (3 placeholders, 2-4 hours)

   • Update documentation to match code implementation
   • Validate time windows in code

2. Classify Time Windows (74 placeholders, 8-12 hours)

   • Use name-based extraction for *_7d, *_28d patterns
   • Extract from code default parameters
   • Manual classification for unclear cases

3. Add Categories and Descriptions (49 placeholders, 4-6 hours)

   • Bulk update from audit semantic analysis
   • Use existing audit report classifications

Next Sprint (P1)

1. Add Confidence Logic (103 placeholders, 12-16 hours)

   • Implement for trend/delta placeholders
   • Add min-data thresholds

2. Document Data Layer Modules (100 placeholders, 6-8 hours)

   • Trace resolver functions to data layer
   • Document source tables

Later (P2-P3)

1. Integrate Unused Placeholders (67 placeholders)

   • Create prompt use cases
   • Plan integration timeline

2. Achieve Production Status (30+ placeholders)

   • Reach 80%+ metadata completeness
   • Complete all normative requirements

Conclusion

The reconciliation process successfully analyzed all 111 placeholders. While only 8 are currently fully compliant, the systematic gaps are primarily documentation-related rather than functional. With a structured remediation plan (estimated 82-110 hours), the system can reach

60% normative conformity within 4-6 weeks.

Next Steps:

1. Review this summary with product/tech leads
2. Prioritize P0 items for immediate action
3. Begin systematic remediation following the implementation waves