Enhance Path Evaluation and Slot Management Features

- Introduced `_parse_slot_refs_from_text` to extract and convert slot references from text, improving the handling of user input in path evaluations.
- Updated `_problematic_slots_from_path_qa` to utilize the new parsing function, enhancing the identification of problematic slots based on various hints and issues.
- Enhanced `ProgressionGraphEditor` and `ProgressionOptimizeCompareModal` to better display identified problem slots and their associated reasons, improving user feedback during evaluations.
- Added tests for new parsing functionality and its integration with existing slot management processes, ensuring robustness in slot reference handling.

backend/planning_exercise_path_builder.py

@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ planning_progression_roadmap.py und PLANNING_PROGRESSION_ROADMAP_SPEC.md.
 """
 from __future__ import annotations
 
+import re
 from typing import Any, Callable, Dict, List, Mapping, Optional, Sequence, Set, Tuple
 
 from fastapi import HTTPException
@@ -149,6 +150,7 @@ class ProgressionPathSuggestRequest(BaseModel):
     baseline_quality_score: Optional[float] = Field(default=None, ge=0.0, le=1.0)
     include_incremental_diff_scoring: bool = False
     unified_slot_review: bool = False
+    baseline_path_qa_snapshot: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None
 
 
 def _resolve_planning_catalog_context(
@@ -1165,6 +1167,7 @@ def _match_roadmap_slot(
     anchor_variant_id: Optional[int],
     used: Set[int],
     slot_priority_exercise_id: Optional[int] = None,
+    skip_post_match_gate: bool = False,
 ) -> Tuple[Optional[Dict[str, Any]], Optional[StageSpecArtifact]]:
     """Einzelnen Roadmap-Slot matchen (Initial-Build und Auto-Rematch)."""
     major_by_index: Dict[int, MajorStep] = {}
@@ -1331,11 +1334,15 @@ def _match_roadmap_slot(
     else:
         step["slot_status"] = "matched"
         step["roadmap_match_source"] = "stage_spec"
-    if step.get("roadmap_match_source") != "slot_best_match" and not _roadmap_step_passes_post_match_gate(
-        cur,
-        step,
-        goal_query=goal_query,
-        semantic_brief=semantic_brief,
+    if (
+        not skip_post_match_gate
+        and step.get("roadmap_match_source") != "slot_best_match"
+        and not _roadmap_step_passes_post_match_gate(
+            cur,
+            step,
+            goal_query=goal_query,
+            semantic_brief=semantic_brief,
+        )
     ):
         return None, stage_spec
     return step, None
@@ -2478,6 +2485,21 @@ def _resolve_hint_major_index(
     return pos if pos >= 0 else None
 
 
+def _parse_slot_refs_from_text(text: str) -> Set[int]:
+    """„Schritt 8“ / „Slot 8“ / „Stufe 8“ → 0-basierter major_step_index (7)."""
+    found: Set[int] = set()
+    if not text:
+        return found
+    for match in re.finditer(r"(?:schritt|slot|stufe)\s*(\d+)", text.lower()):
+        try:
+            n = int(match.group(1))
+        except (TypeError, ValueError):
+            continue
+        if n >= 1:
+            found.add(n - 1)
+    return found
+
+
 def _problematic_slots_from_path_qa(
     baseline_qa: Optional[Mapping[str, Any]],
     baseline_steps: Sequence[Mapping[str, Any]],
@@ -2504,13 +2526,32 @@ def _problematic_slots_from_path_qa(
         if not isinstance(hint, dict):
             continue
         action = str(hint.get("action") or "").strip().lower()
-        if action in ("review_roadmap", "refine_stage_spec"):
+        if action == "review_roadmap":
             continue
         midx = _resolve_hint_major_index(hint, stage_specs)
+        if midx is None:
+            title = str(hint.get("title") or "")
+            for ref in _parse_slot_refs_from_text(
+                " ".join(
+                    str(hint.get(k) or "")
+                    for k in ("reason", "issue", "title", "roadmap_learning_goal")
+                )
+            ):
+                midx = ref
+                break
+            if title:
+                for step in baseline_steps or []:
+                    if not isinstance(step, dict):
+                        continue
+                    st = str(step.get("title") or "").strip()
+                    smidx = step.get("roadmap_major_step_index")
+                    if st and title.lower() in st.lower() and smidx is not None:
+                        midx = int(smidx)
+                        break
         if midx is None:
             continue
         _add(
-            midx,
+            int(midx),
             str(
                 hint.get("reason")
                 or hint.get("issue")
@@ -2519,6 +2560,18 @@ def _problematic_slots_from_path_qa(
             ),
         )
 
+    llm_text_parts: List[str] = []
+    for key in ("topic_coverage",):
+        raw = (baseline_qa or {}).get(key)
+        if raw:
+            llm_text_parts.append(str(raw))
+    for key in ("issues", "recommendations", "sequence_notes"):
+        for raw in (baseline_qa or {}).get(key) or []:
+            llm_text_parts.append(str(raw or ""))
+    combined = "\n".join(llm_text_parts)
+    for midx in _parse_slot_refs_from_text(combined):
+        _add(midx, "In Pfad-Bewertung als Schachstelle genannt")
+
     for raw in (baseline_qa or {}).get("issues") or []:
         text = str(raw or "").strip()
         if not text:
@@ -2535,7 +2588,8 @@ def _problematic_slots_from_path_qa(
                 continue
             title = str(step.get("title") or "").strip()
             if (
-                f"slot {slot_no}" in text.lower()
+                f"schritt {slot_no}" in text.lower()
+                or f"slot {slot_no}" in text.lower()
                 or f"stufe {slot_no}" in text.lower()
                 or (title and title.lower() in text.lower())
             ):
@@ -2896,6 +2950,7 @@ def _roadmap_slot_library_candidates(
     used: Set[int],
     exclude_exercise_id: Optional[int] = None,
     max_candidates: int = 5,
+    skip_post_match_gate: bool = False,
 ) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]:
     """Mehrere Bibliotheks-Kandidaten je Slot (beste zuerst, aktuelle optional ausgeschlossen)."""
     pick_used = set(used)
@@ -2925,6 +2980,7 @@ def _roadmap_slot_library_candidates(
             anchor_variant_id=anchor_variant_id,
             used=pick_used,
             slot_priority_exercise_id=None,
+            skip_post_match_gate=skip_post_match_gate,
         )
         if not step or step.get("exercise_id") is None:
             break
@@ -2993,34 +3049,55 @@ def _run_unified_slot_improvement_review(
             detail="unified_slot_review erfordert Roadmap (roadmap_override / roadmap_first)",
         )
 
-    eval_body = body.model_copy(
-        update={
-            "include_llm_path_qa": body.include_llm_path_qa,
-            "include_ai_gap_fill": body.include_ai_gap_fill,
-            "auto_rematch_after_qa": False,
-        }
-    )
     baseline_steps = _evaluate_steps_from_payload(cur, body.baseline_evaluate_steps)
-    qa_pack = _run_evaluate_only_path_qa(
-        cur,
-        body=eval_body,
-        goal_query=goal_query,
-        semantic_brief=semantic_brief,
-        steps=list(baseline_steps),
-        roadmap_ctx=roadmap_ctx,
+    snapshot = (
+        dict(body.baseline_path_qa_snapshot)
+        if isinstance(body.baseline_path_qa_snapshot, dict)
+        else None
     )
-    baseline_steps = list(qa_pack.get("steps") or baseline_steps)
-    baseline_qa = qa_pack.get("path_qa") if isinstance(qa_pack.get("path_qa"), dict) else {}
-    if baseline_qa.get("quality_score") is None:
-        baseline_qa = dict(baseline_qa)
-        baseline_qa["quality_score"] = compute_deterministic_path_quality_score(
-            gaps=baseline_qa.get("large_gaps") or [],
-            off_topic_steps=baseline_qa.get("off_topic_steps") or [],
-            steps=baseline_steps,
-            multistage_qa=baseline_qa,
+    if snapshot:
+        baseline_qa = snapshot
+        if baseline_qa.get("quality_score") is None:
+            baseline_qa["quality_score"] = compute_deterministic_path_quality_score(
+                gaps=baseline_qa.get("large_gaps") or [],
+                off_topic_steps=baseline_qa.get("off_topic_steps") or [],
+                steps=baseline_steps,
+                multistage_qa=baseline_qa,
+            )
+        baseline_score = (
+            float(body.baseline_quality_score)
+            if body.baseline_quality_score is not None
+            else _path_qa_quality_score(baseline_qa)
         )
-    baseline_score = _path_qa_quality_score(baseline_qa)
-    gap_fill_offers = list(qa_pack.get("gap_fill_offers") or [])
+        gap_fill_offers: List[Dict[str, Any]] = []
+    else:
+        eval_body = body.model_copy(
+            update={
+                "include_llm_path_qa": body.include_llm_path_qa,
+                "include_ai_gap_fill": body.include_ai_gap_fill,
+                "auto_rematch_after_qa": False,
+            }
+        )
+        qa_pack = _run_evaluate_only_path_qa(
+            cur,
+            body=eval_body,
+            goal_query=goal_query,
+            semantic_brief=semantic_brief,
+            steps=list(baseline_steps),
+            roadmap_ctx=roadmap_ctx,
+        )
+        baseline_steps = list(qa_pack.get("steps") or baseline_steps)
+        baseline_qa = qa_pack.get("path_qa") if isinstance(qa_pack.get("path_qa"), dict) else {}
+        if baseline_qa.get("quality_score") is None:
+            baseline_qa = dict(baseline_qa)
+            baseline_qa["quality_score"] = compute_deterministic_path_quality_score(
+                gaps=baseline_qa.get("large_gaps") or [],
+                off_topic_steps=baseline_qa.get("off_topic_steps") or [],
+                steps=baseline_steps,
+                multistage_qa=baseline_qa,
+            )
+        baseline_score = _path_qa_quality_score(baseline_qa)
+        gap_fill_offers = list(qa_pack.get("gap_fill_offers") or [])
     off_topic_map = _off_topic_reasons_by_slot(baseline_qa.get("off_topic_steps") or [])
     problem_slots = _problematic_slots_from_path_qa(
         baseline_qa,
@@ -3076,6 +3153,7 @@ def _run_unified_slot_improvement_review(
             except (TypeError, ValueError):
                 exclude_id = None
 
+        relax_match_gate = bool(off_topic or slot_problem)
         candidates = _roadmap_slot_library_candidates(
             cur,
             tenant=tenant,
@@ -3093,8 +3171,9 @@ def _run_unified_slot_improvement_review(
             anchor_id=anchor_id,
             anchor_variant_id=anchor_variant_id,
             used=used_other,
-            exclude_exercise_id=exclude_id if not off_topic else int(current_id) if current_id else None,
-            max_candidates=3,
+            exclude_exercise_id=int(current_id) if current_id is not None else exclude_id,
+            max_candidates=5 if relax_match_gate else 3,
+            skip_post_match_gate=relax_match_gate,
         )
 
         accepted_for_slot = False

backend/tests/test_planning_problematic_slots.py

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 """Schachstellen-Erkennung für unified Slot-Review."""
 from planning_exercise_path_builder import (
+    _parse_slot_refs_from_text,
     _problematic_slots_from_path_qa,
     _slot_suggestion_accepted,
 )
@@ -51,3 +52,46 @@ def test_slot_suggestion_accepted_for_problem_slot():
         major_idx=1,
         slot_problem=True,
     )
+
+
+def test_parse_slot_refs_schritt_is_one_based():
+    assert _parse_slot_refs_from_text("Schritt 8 (Ukemi Vorwärts) entfernen") == {7}
+    assert _parse_slot_refs_from_text("slot 3 und Stufe 5") == {2, 4}
+
+
+def test_problematic_slots_from_refine_stage_spec_hint():
+    qa = {
+        "optimization_hints": [
+            {
+                "action": "refine_stage_spec",
+                "step_index": 7,
+                "issue": "stage_mismatch",
+                "reason": "Stufen-Fit zu schwach (0.00) für „Integration von Täuschung“",
+            }
+        ],
+        "off_topic_steps": [],
+    }
+    steps = [
+        {"roadmap_major_step_index": i, "exercise_id": i + 1, "title": f"Übung {i + 1}"}
+        for i in range(8)
+    ]
+    steps[7]["title"] = "Ukemi Vorwärts"
+    specs = [_spec(i) for i in range(8)]
+    problems = _problematic_slots_from_path_qa(qa, steps, specs)
+    assert 7 in problems
+
+
+def test_problematic_slots_from_llm_schritt_text():
+    qa = {
+        "optimization_hints": [],
+        "off_topic_steps": [],
+        "issues": [
+            "Schritt 8 (Ukemi Vorwärts) hat keinen Bezug zur Kumite-Beinarbeit",
+        ],
+    }
+    steps = [
+        {"roadmap_major_step_index": 7, "exercise_id": 99, "title": "Ukemi Vorwärts"},
+    ]
+    specs = [_spec(7)]
+    problems = _problematic_slots_from_path_qa(qa, steps, specs)
+    assert 7 in problems

frontend/src/components/ProgressionGraphEditor.jsx

@@ -507,6 +507,11 @@ export default function ProgressionGraphEditor({ graphId, embedded = false, onSa
       evaluate_only: false,
       unified_slot_review: true,
       baseline_evaluate_steps: slotsToEvaluateSteps(synced),
+      baseline_path_qa_snapshot: baselineRes?.path_qa || null,
+      baseline_quality_score:
+        baselineRes?.path_qa?.quality_score != null
+          ? Number(baselineRes.path_qa.quality_score)
+          : null,
       include_llm_intent: false,
       auto_rematch_after_qa: false,
     })

frontend/src/components/ProgressionOptimizeCompareModal.jsx

@@ -222,10 +222,50 @@ export default function ProgressionOptimizeCompareModal({
         ) : null}
 
         {dialogDiffs.length === 0 ? (
-          <p style={{ fontSize: '12px', color: 'var(--text2)' }}>
-            Keine Verbesserung gefunden — dein Pfad ist für alle Slots bereits optimal bewertet
-            oder es fehlen passende Bibliotheks-Treffer (KI-Angebote im Bewertungs-Panel).
-          </p>
+          <>
+            <p style={{ fontSize: '12px', color: 'var(--text2)' }}>
+              Keine Bibliotheks-Verbesserung mit messbarem Gewinn — Schachstellen siehe unten.
+              KI-Angebote im Bewertungs-Panel oder „Brücke / KI-Angebot“ nutzen.
+            </p>
+            {comparison?.problem_slots && Object.keys(comparison.problem_slots).length > 0 ? (
+              <ul
+                style={{
+                  listStyle: 'none',
+                  padding: 0,
+                  margin: '12px 0 0',
+                  display: 'flex',
+                  flexDirection: 'column',
+                  gap: '8px',
+                }}
+              >
+                {Object.entries(comparison.problem_slots).map(([midxRaw, reasons]) => {
+                  const midx = Number(midxRaw)
+                  const reasonList = Array.isArray(reasons) ? reasons : [reasons]
+                  return (
+                    <li
+                      key={`problem-${midxRaw}`}
+                      style={{
+                        padding: '10px 12px',
+                        borderRadius: '8px',
+                        border: '1px solid var(--danger)',
+                        background: 'var(--surface2)',
+                        fontSize: '12px',
+                      }}
+                    >
+                      <strong style={{ color: 'var(--danger)' }}>
+                        Schachstelle Slot {midx + 1}
+                      </strong>
+                      <ul style={{ margin: '6px 0 0', paddingLeft: '16px', color: 'var(--text2)' }}>
+                        {reasonList.filter(Boolean).map((text, i) => (
+                          <li key={`${midxRaw}-r-${i}`}>{text}</li>
+                        ))}
+                      </ul>
+                    </li>
+                  )
+                })}
+              </ul>
+            ) : null}
+          </>
         ) : (
           <>
             <div style={{ display: 'flex', gap: '8px', marginBottom: '8px', flexWrap: 'wrap' }}>