Enhance Progression Path Evaluation and Comparison Logic

- Introduced `_steps_to_evaluate_payloads` to convert path steps into evaluation payloads for improved quality assessments.
- Updated `_build_progression_compare_response` to include a new `proposed_eval` parameter, allowing for fair quality assessment comparisons.
- Enhanced `ProgressionGraphEditor` to utilize the new pipeline quality assessment data.
- Modified `ProgressionOptimizeCompareModal` to display detailed comparison results, including handling of trivial slot differences and optimization hints.
- Bumped version to reflect the new features and improvements.

backend/planning_exercise_path_builder.py

@@ -2176,6 +2176,52 @@ def _steps_by_major_index(steps: Sequence[Mapping[str, Any]]) -> Dict[int, Dict[
     return out
 
 
+def _steps_to_evaluate_payloads(steps: Sequence[Mapping[str, Any]]) -> List[EvaluateStepPayload]:
+    """Pfad-Schritte → evaluate_steps (für faire QS auf dem End-Stand)."""
+    payloads: List[EvaluateStepPayload] = []
+    for step in steps or []:
+        if not isinstance(step, dict):
+            continue
+        midx = step.get("roadmap_major_step_index")
+        if midx is None:
+            continue
+        eid = step.get("exercise_id")
+        is_proposal = bool(step.get("is_ai_proposal")) or eid is None
+        payloads.append(
+            EvaluateStepPayload(
+                exercise_id=int(eid) if eid is not None and not is_proposal else None,
+                variant_id=step.get("variant_id"),
+                title=step.get("title"),
+                is_ai_proposal=is_proposal,
+                ai_suggestion=step.get("ai_suggestion") if isinstance(step.get("ai_suggestion"), dict) else None,
+                proposal_key=step.get("proposal_key"),
+                roadmap_major_step_index=int(midx),
+                roadmap_phase=step.get("roadmap_phase"),
+                roadmap_learning_goal=step.get("roadmap_learning_goal"),
+            )
+        )
+    payloads.sort(key=lambda p: int(p.roadmap_major_step_index or 0))
+    return payloads
+
+
+def _normalize_slot_title(title: Optional[str]) -> str:
+    return (title or "").strip().casefold()
+
+
+def _filter_trivial_slot_diffs(diffs: Sequence[Mapping[str, Any]]) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]:
+    """Gleicher sichtbarer Titel = kein inhaltlicher Wechsel (nur ID-Doppel in der Bibliothek)."""
+    out: List[Dict[str, Any]] = []
+    for raw in diffs or []:
+        if not isinstance(raw, dict):
+            continue
+        bt = _normalize_slot_title(raw.get("baseline_title"))
+        pt = _normalize_slot_title(raw.get("proposed_title"))
+        if bt and pt and bt == pt:
+            continue
+        out.append(dict(raw))
+    return out
+
+
 def _build_progression_slot_diffs(
     baseline_steps: Sequence[Mapping[str, Any]],
     proposed_steps: Sequence[Mapping[str, Any]],
@@ -2211,24 +2257,35 @@ def _build_progression_slot_diffs(
 def _build_progression_compare_response(
     baseline: Mapping[str, Any],
     proposed: Mapping[str, Any],
+    *,
+    proposed_eval: Optional[Mapping[str, Any]] = None,
 ) -> Dict[str, Any]:
     baseline_steps = list(baseline.get("steps") or [])
     proposed_steps = list(proposed.get("steps") or [])
     baseline_qa = baseline.get("path_qa") if isinstance(baseline.get("path_qa"), dict) else {}
-    proposed_qa = proposed.get("path_qa") if isinstance(proposed.get("path_qa"), dict) else {}
-    slot_diffs = _build_progression_slot_diffs(baseline_steps, proposed_steps)
+    pipeline_qa = proposed.get("path_qa") if isinstance(proposed.get("path_qa"), dict) else {}
+    fair_qa = (
+        proposed_eval.get("path_qa")
+        if isinstance(proposed_eval, dict) and isinstance(proposed_eval.get("path_qa"), dict)
+        else pipeline_qa
+    )
+    slot_diffs = _filter_trivial_slot_diffs(
+        _build_progression_slot_diffs(baseline_steps, proposed_steps),
+    )
     return {
         **dict(proposed),
         "comparison_mode": True,
         "baseline_steps": baseline_steps,
         "baseline_path_qa": baseline_qa,
         "proposed_steps": proposed_steps,
-        "proposed_path_qa": proposed_qa,
+        "proposed_path_qa": fair_qa,
+        "proposed_path_qa_pipeline": pipeline_qa,
         "slot_diffs": slot_diffs,
         "slot_diff_count": len(slot_diffs),
         "baseline_quality_score": _path_qa_quality_score(baseline_qa),
-        "proposed_quality_score": _path_qa_quality_score(proposed_qa),
-        "path_qa": proposed_qa,
+        "proposed_quality_score": _path_qa_quality_score(fair_qa),
+        "proposed_pipeline_quality_score": _path_qa_quality_score(pipeline_qa),
+        "path_qa": fair_qa,
         "steps": proposed_steps,
     }
 
@@ -2273,7 +2330,21 @@ def suggest_progression_path(
             }
         )
         proposed = suggest_progression_path(cur, tenant=tenant, body=proposed_body)
-        return _build_progression_compare_response(baseline, proposed)
+        proposed_eval_payloads = _steps_to_evaluate_payloads(proposed.get("steps") or [])
+        proposed_eval: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None
+        if proposed_eval_payloads:
+            proposed_eval_body = body.model_copy(
+                update={
+                    "evaluate_only": True,
+                    "evaluate_steps": proposed_eval_payloads,
+                    "compare_with_assignments": False,
+                    "include_llm_intent": False,
+                    "auto_rematch_after_qa": False,
+                    "include_roadmap_preview": False,
+                }
+            )
+            proposed_eval = suggest_progression_path(cur, tenant=tenant, body=proposed_eval_body)
+        return _build_progression_compare_response(baseline, proposed, proposed_eval=proposed_eval)
 
     goal_query = _normalize_query(body.query)
     if len(goal_query) < 3:

backend/tests/test_planning_compare_slot_diffs.py

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+"""Tests Vergleichs-Diffs (triviale ID-Tausche ausfiltern)."""
+from planning_exercise_path_builder import (
+    _build_progression_slot_diffs,
+    _filter_trivial_slot_diffs,
+)
+
+
+def test_filter_trivial_slot_diffs_same_title_different_id():
+    diffs = [
+        {
+            "roadmap_major_step_index": 1,
+            "baseline_exercise_id": 10,
+            "baseline_title": "Rhythmuswechsel in der Kumite-Beinarbeit",
+            "proposed_exercise_id": 99,
+            "proposed_title": "Rhythmuswechsel in der Kumite-Beinarbeit",
+        }
+    ]
+    assert _filter_trivial_slot_diffs(diffs) == []
+
+
+def test_filter_trivial_slot_diffs_keeps_real_title_change():
+    diffs = [
+        {
+            "roadmap_major_step_index": 1,
+            "baseline_exercise_id": 10,
+            "baseline_title": "Alt",
+            "proposed_exercise_id": 99,
+            "proposed_title": "Neu",
+        }
+    ]
+    filtered = _filter_trivial_slot_diffs(diffs)
+    assert len(filtered) == 1
+    assert filtered[0]["proposed_title"] == "Neu"
+
+
+def test_build_slot_diffs_then_filter():
+    baseline = [
+        {"roadmap_major_step_index": 0, "exercise_id": 1, "title": "A"},
+        {"roadmap_major_step_index": 1, "exercise_id": 10, "title": "Gleich"},
+    ]
+    proposed = [
+        {"roadmap_major_step_index": 0, "exercise_id": 1, "title": "A"},
+        {"roadmap_major_step_index": 1, "exercise_id": 77, "title": "Gleich"},
+    ]
+    raw = _build_progression_slot_diffs(baseline, proposed)
+    assert len(raw) == 1
+    assert _filter_trivial_slot_diffs(raw) == []

frontend/src/components/ProgressionGraphEditor.jsx

@@ -505,8 +505,9 @@ export default function ProgressionGraphEditor({ graphId, embedded = false, onSa
     setTargetSummary(res?.target_profile_summary || null)
     const baselineQa = res?.baseline_path_qa || null
     const proposedQa = res?.proposed_path_qa || res?.path_qa || null
+    const pipelineQa = res?.proposed_path_qa_pipeline || null
     setPathQa(baselineQa)
-    setProposedPathQa(proposedQa)
+    setProposedPathQa(pipelineQa)
 
     const openCompareDialog = (diffCount, noticePrefix) => {
       setComparePayload(res)

frontend/src/components/ProgressionOptimizeCompareModal.jsx

@@ -37,11 +37,17 @@ export default function ProgressionOptimizeCompareModal({
   const proposedQa = comparison.proposed_path_qa || comparison.path_qa
   const baselinePct = pathQaQualityPercent(baselineQa)
   const proposedPct = pathQaQualityPercent(proposedQa)
-  const rematchRounds = proposedQa?.rematch_rounds
-  const rematchCount = Array.isArray(proposedQa?.rematch_log) ? proposedQa.rematch_log.length : 0
-  const refineCount = Array.isArray(proposedQa?.refine_log) ? proposedQa.refine_log.length : 0
-  const hintCount = Number(proposedQa?.optimization_hint_count || 0)
-  const tierCount = Array.isArray(proposedQa?.qa_tiers) ? proposedQa.qa_tiers.length : 0
+  const pipelinePct = pathQaQualityPercent(comparison?.proposed_path_qa_pipeline)
+  const rematchRounds = comparison?.proposed_path_qa_pipeline?.rematch_rounds
+    ?? proposedQa?.rematch_rounds
+  const pipelineQa = comparison?.proposed_path_qa_pipeline
+  const rematchCount = Array.isArray(pipelineQa?.rematch_log) ? pipelineQa.rematch_log.length : 0
+  const refineCount = Array.isArray(pipelineQa?.refine_log) ? pipelineQa.refine_log.length : 0
+  const hintCount = Number(pipelineQa?.optimization_hint_count || 0)
+  const tierCount = Array.isArray(pipelineQa?.qa_tiers) ? pipelineQa.qa_tiers.length : 0
+  const noMeaningfulDiffs = slotDiffs.length === 0
+  const proposedNotBetter =
+    proposedPct != null && baselinePct != null && proposedPct <= baselinePct
 
   const toggle = (midx) => {
     setSelected((prev) => {
@@ -75,10 +81,42 @@ export default function ProgressionOptimizeCompareModal({
           Optimierung vergleichen
         </h3>
         <p style={{ fontSize: '12px', color: 'var(--text3)', marginTop: 0, lineHeight: 1.45 }}>
-          Links dein aktueller Pfad, rechts der Vorschlag nach vollem Match inkl. Auto-Optimierung.
-          Wähle die Slots, die du übernehmen möchtest.
+          Vergleicht deinen Pfad mit dem End-Stand nach Match — beide Seiten mit derselben Bewertungslogik
+          wie „Graph bewerten“. Auto-Rematch-Details stehen im Panel, nicht in der Prozentzahl.
         </p>
 
+        {noMeaningfulDiffs || proposedNotBetter ? (
+          <div
+            style={{
+              marginBottom: '12px',
+              padding: '10px 12px',
+              borderRadius: '8px',
+              border: '1px solid color-mix(in srgb, var(--danger) 35%, var(--border))',
+              background: 'color-mix(in srgb, var(--danger) 8%, var(--surface2))',
+              fontSize: '12px',
+              lineHeight: 1.45,
+            }}
+          >
+            {noMeaningfulDiffs ? (
+              <strong>Keine inhaltlichen Slot-Änderungen</strong>
+            ) : (
+              <strong>Vorschlag nicht besser als dein Pfad</strong>
+            )}
+            {noMeaningfulDiffs ? (
+              <p style={{ margin: '6px 0 0', color: 'var(--text2)' }}>
+                Rematch hat höchstens dieselben Übungen unter anderen IDs getroffen — kein Grund zur
+                Übernahme. Bitte abbrechen.
+              </p>
+            ) : (
+              <p style={{ margin: '6px 0 0', color: 'var(--text2)' }}>
+                Fair bewertet liefert der Vorschlag keinen höheren Pfad-QS-Wert. Die frühere niedrigere
+                Pipeline-Zahl{pipelinePct != null ? ` (${pipelinePct} %)` : ''} stammte aus dem
+                Rematch-Lauf, nicht aus dem sichtbaren End-Pfad.
+              </p>
+            )}
+          </div>
+        ) : null}
+
         <div
           style={{
             display: 'grid',
@@ -140,7 +178,7 @@ export default function ProgressionOptimizeCompareModal({
 
         {slotDiffs.length === 0 ? (
           <p style={{ fontSize: '12px', color: 'var(--text2)' }}>
-            Keine abweichenden Slot-Zuordnungen — der optimierte Lauf liefert denselben Pfad.
+            Keine inhaltlichen Abweichungen — der End-Stand entspricht deinem Pfad.
           </p>
         ) : (
           <>
@@ -187,9 +225,11 @@ export default function ProgressionOptimizeCompareModal({
                         >
                           <span style={{ color: 'var(--text2)' }}>
                             Bisher: {diff.baseline_title || '— leer —'}
+                            {diff.baseline_exercise_id != null ? ` (#${diff.baseline_exercise_id})` : ''}
                           </span>
                           <span style={{ color: 'var(--accent-dark)' }}>
                             Neu: {diff.proposed_title || '— leer —'}
+                            {diff.proposed_exercise_id != null ? ` (#${diff.proposed_exercise_id})` : ''}
                           </span>
                         </div>
                       </span>
@@ -208,7 +248,7 @@ export default function ProgressionOptimizeCompareModal({
           <button
             type="button"
             className="btn btn-primary"
-            disabled={applying || selected.size === 0 || slotDiffs.length === 0}
+            disabled={applying || selected.size === 0 || slotDiffs.length === 0 || proposedNotBetter}
             onClick={() => onApplySelected([...selected])}
           >
             {applying ? 'Übernehmen …' : `Auswahl übernehmen (${selected.size})`}