Lars ae93b9d428 docs: goal system priority analysis - hybrid approach ... Key Decision: Minimal Goal System BEFORE Placeholders Critical Finding: - Same data = different interpretation per goal - Example: -5kg FM, -2kg LBM - weight_loss: 78/100 (good!) - strength: 32/100 (LBM loss critical!) - Without goal: 50/100 (generic, wrong for both) Recommended Approach (Hybrid): 1. Phase 0a (2-3h): Minimal Goal System - DB: goal_mode field - API: Get/Set Goal - UI: Goal Selector - Default: health 2. Phase 0b (16-20h): Goal-Aware Placeholders - 84 placeholders with goal-dependent calculations - Scores use goal_mode from day 1 - No rework needed later 3. Phase 2+ (6-8h): Full Goal System - Goal recognition from patterns - Secondary goals - Goal progression tracking Why Hybrid Works: ✅ Charts show correct interpretations immediately ✅ No rework of 84 placeholders later ✅ Goal recognition can come later (needs placeholders anyway) ✅ System is "smart coach" from day 1 File: docs/GOAL_SYSTEM_PRIORITY_ANALYSIS.md (650 lines)		2026-03-26 16:08:00 +01:00
..
issues	feat: Feature Request #49 - Prompt-Zuordnung zu Verlaufsseiten	2026-03-26 15:12:39 +01:00
GOAL_SYSTEM_PRIORITY_ANALYSIS.md	docs: goal system priority analysis - hybrid approach	2026-03-26 16:08:00 +01:00
KONZEPT_ANALYSE_2026-03-26.md	docs: comprehensive functional concept analysis	2026-03-26 15:26:12 +01:00
MEMBERSHIP_SYSTEM.md	docs: update CLAUDE.md and add comprehensive membership system documentation	2026-03-20 15:44:29 +01:00
STATUS_REPORT_2026-03-26.md	docs: comprehensive status report 26.03.2026	2026-03-26 14:53:45 +01:00