ROOT CAUSE: get_active_goals() SELECT was missing start_date and created_at
IMPACT: Time-based deviation calculation failed silently for all goals
Now returns:
- start_date: Required for accurate time-based progress calculation
- created_at: Fallback when start_date is not set
This fixes:
- Zielgewicht (weight) should now show +7% ahead
- Körperfett should show time deviation
- All goals with target_date now have time-based tracking
Goal progress placeholders were filtering out all goals because
start_value was missing from the SELECT statement.
Added start_value to both:
- get_active_goals() - for placeholder formatters
- get_goal_by_id() - for consistency
This will fix:
- active_goals_md progress column (was all "-")
- top_3_goals_behind_schedule (was "keine Ziele")
- top_3_goals_on_track (was "keine Ziele")
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Calculates average count per week over 30 days
- Use case: Training frequency per week (smoothed)
- Formula: (count in 30 days) / 4.285 weeks
- Documentation: .claude/docs/technical/AGGREGATION_METHODS.md
Final bug fixes:
1. blood_pressure_log query - changed 'date' column to 'measured_at' (correct column for TIMESTAMP)
2. top_goal_name KeyError - added 'name' to SELECT in get_active_goals()
3. top_goal_name fallback - use goal_type if name is NULL
Changes:
- scores.py: Fixed blood_pressure_log query to use measured_at instead of date
- goal_utils.py: Added 'name' column to get_active_goals() SELECT
- placeholder_resolver.py: Added fallback to goal_type if name is None
These were the last 2 errors showing in logs. All major calculation bugs should now be fixed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Fixed: column 'date' does not exist in blood_pressure_log
blood_pressure_log uses 'measured_at' instead of 'date'.
Added DATE_COLUMN_MAP for table-specific date columns:
- blood_pressure_log → measured_at
- fitness_tests → test_date
- all others → date
Replaced all hardcoded 'date' with dynamic date_col variable.
Fixes error: [ERROR] Failed to fetch value from blood_pressure_log.systolic
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
BREAKING: Replaces single 'primary goal' with weighted multi-goal system
Migration 027:
- New table: focus_areas (6 dimensions with percentages)
- Constraint: Sum must equal 100%
- Auto-migration: goal_mode → focus_areas for existing users
- Unique constraint: One active focus_areas per profile
Backend:
- get_focus_weights() V2: Reads from focus_areas table
- Fallback: Uses goal_mode if focus_areas not set
- New endpoints: GET/PUT /api/goals/focus-areas
- Validation: Sum=100, range 0-100
API:
- getFocusAreas() - Get current weights
- updateFocusAreas(data) - Update weights (upsert)
Focus dimensions:
1. weight_loss_pct (Fettabbau)
2. muscle_gain_pct (Muskelaufbau)
3. strength_pct (Kraftsteigerung)
4. endurance_pct (Ausdauer)
5. flexibility_pct (Beweglichkeit)
6. health_pct (Allgemeine Gesundheit)
Benefits:
- Multiple goals with custom priorities
- More flexible than single primary goal
- KI can use weighted scores
- Ready for Phase 0b placeholder integration
UI: Coming in next commit (slider interface)
NEW FEATURE: Filter conditions for goal types
Enables counting/aggregating specific subsets of data.
Example use case: Count only strength training sessions per week
- Create goal type with filter: {"training_type": "strength"}
- count_7d now counts only strength training, not all activities
Implementation:
- Migration 026: filter_conditions JSONB column
- Backend: Dynamic WHERE clause building from JSON filters
- Supports single value: {"training_type": "strength"}
- Supports multiple values: {"training_type": ["strength", "hiit"]}
- Works with all 8 aggregation methods (count, avg, sum, min, max)
- Frontend: JSON textarea with example + validation
- Pydantic models: filter_conditions field added
Technical details:
- SQL injection safe (parameterized queries)
- Graceful degradation (invalid JSON ignored with warning)
- Backward compatible (NULL filters = no filtering)
Answers user question: 'Kann ich Trainingstypen wie Krafttraining separat zählen?'
Answer: YES! 🎯
